In the replica watch circle, “Black Rock Candy” has always been a popular style. Its iconic dual calendar display, gold electroplated case and black dial combination are both retro and versatile. The two recent high-profile versions – RC Double Calendar Black Rock Sugar and QF Black Rock Sugar, have caused many watch friends to suffer from “difficulty in choosing”. Today we will conduct an in-depth comparison, from counterweight, movement, workmanship to details and texture, to help you choose the one that is truly worth buying.
Counterweight comparison: Who is closer to the original product?
Counterweight is an important indicator of the quality of a replica watch. The RC version uses Shanghai 3235 movement (miswritten as 3255 in the article, which has been corrected according to the common expression in the industry), and the entire watch weighs210g, basically replicating the heavy feel of the original product. QF launches three versions:
- V5 version: 2836 movement, 184 grams;
- V6 version: 2836 movement, 202 grams;
- V8 version: Dandong 3235 movement, only 190 grams.
Obviously,RC is better in counterweight, especially suitable for players who pursue “weight in hand”. Although the QF V6 is close to 200 grams, it is still 8 grams lighter than the RC, and there is a slight difference in feel.
Movement selection: a trade-off between stability and cost-effectiveness
RC insists on usingShanghai 3255 movement, good stability, accurate adjustment, suitable for daily wear. QF is flexible in different versions:
- If the budget is limited, the 2836 movement of V5/V6 is cost-effective and reliable;
- If you pursue a higher movement configuration, although the V8 uses Dandong 3255, the counterweight is sacrificed because the movement itself is lighter.
Therefore,Choose RC if you are looking for “one step”, or QF V6 if you are on a limited budget but want quality., it is a rational choice.
Detailed workmanship: Which one is more exquisite, disk, hands or electroplating?
The appearance of both models is gold plating with black plates, making them indistinguishable from a distance. But when you zoom in and take a closer look, the difference becomes apparent:
- RC disk surface is brighter, with a strong sense of oiliness, three-dimensional printing on the calendar window, rounded corners with beveled steps, and delicate craftsmanship;
- QF pointer burr processing is better, the polishing is cleaner, but the disc surface is slightly less oily than RC;
- Both the case and steel band are made ofAll gold inside and outThe design, drawing + polishing process is mature, and the two major manufacturers are at the same level.
There is almost no difference in daily wear, but for details, RC has a slight advantage in the texture of the disk.
Summary: Both models are cost-effective choices, but their positioning is different.
- RC double calendar black rock candy: Sufficient counterweight (210g), exquisite disk surface, stable movement, suitable for players who pursue “high restoration” and texture;
- QF black rock candy: Multiple versions and flexible prices. The V6 version takes into account both weight and cost performance, and is suitable for entry-level users or those with limited budgets.
No matter which one you choose, the products produced by these two large manufacturers are far superior to those of small manufacturers, and the quality is guaranteed. The real “black rock sugar substitute” is right between these two!